How to Write a Concession Paragraph 2 Sample Refutation Paragraphs Each these samples have 2-paragraph refutation; some essays may only have a 1 paragraph refutation while other essays, like research papers, may require a much longer refutation Charter Schools Vs. Supporters of school choice point out that under the current public school system, parents with economic means already exercise school choice by moving from areas with failing or dangerous schools to neighborhoods with better, safer schools. Their argument is that school choice would allow all parents the freedom, regardless of income level, to select the school that provides the best education Chub and Moe.
Leave a reply [Image description: An adorable little kitten, inside a pink play tube thing. It wants funders to provide general operating funds. Image obtained from Pixabay. Before we begin, thank you to all the colleagues who donated to my organization on my birthday last week.
It helps our mission of developing more leaders of color and strengthening organizations led by communities of color. This blog post is going to be a little more serious than usual.
Especially if you work for a foundation that provides restricted funding, please take a deep breath. Unless something else comes up. An exasperated colleague in an ED group I belong to quoted a Ethical argument letter she got from a foundation: As the majority of the funding request would be going toward wages, the Foundation was unable to support approval of funding for the request.
You know an Executive Director is frustrated when they Ethical argument wasting punctuation marks, since we are all trained to always scrimp and save, such as on grant applications, where we get characters to describe our mission, impact, and evaluation strategies.
Across the field, we have used various arguments in support of general operating funds. Here, again, is the report from GEOwith lots of statistics for the data wonks. Here is a new graphic by Propel Nonprofitsproviding people with a new way to visualize core operating support.
It wants you to give unrestricted funding! I would like to try a different argument: General operating funds allow us nonprofits to be most effective at helping people, including saving lives.
By restricting funds you are impeding our work; therefore, your philosophies and policies are causing people to get hurt and die. And that is unethical.
I know this sounds like a huge exaggeration. I wish it were. But this week I had a conversation with a colleague that made me realize just how serious this is. My colleague told me that her wife, a case manager doing teen suicide prevention and other trauma work, just burned out and left the sector.
The normal case load of clients at her agency was supposed to be around She would take files home, working late into the nights, into the weekends. She was someone that everyone trusted to listen and to provide support.
She would spend entire rare days off comforting someone one step away from ending their own lives. The organization should have hired several more case managers. They said they would. But it never came to pass. The grueling, heartbreaking work took a toll on her and other case managers physically and emotionally, and she left the profession.
But many of these decisions are determined, or at least greatly influenced, by the messages and the restrictions we receive from funders and donors. There are thousands of further stories about how we waste endless amounts of time applying for grants grants that we likely will not getor answering unreasonably burdensome grant reports, time that we are not spending on our work, which means people are not getting the services they need, which means they may get hurt or die.
For so long we nonprofits have treated restricted funding like an inconvenience to be complained about among ourselves and then begrudgingly accepted. But an argument needs to be made that if something directly or indirectly leads to harm or death of innocent people, and we know about it yet refuse to change, then we are in violation of ethical and moral boundaries of our entire profession, including the role of philanthropy.Altruism (also called the ethic of altruism, moralistic altruism, and ethical altruism) is an ethical doctrine that holds that the moral value of an individual's actions depend solely on the impact on other individuals, regardless of the consequences on the individual itself.
James Fieser states the altruist dictum as: "An action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more.
CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO ICONICPHOTO FEATURED ARTICLES PAGE Six Cases for Discussion: ETHICAL ISSUES IN PHOTOGRAPHY Shutter Release, April Ethics are principles reflecting the values of a society—guidelines for its.
Note: Next to each question below, you will find a link to the answer(s) we’ve received for that question. We’ve grown tired of refuting answers, so we present the answers from the religious without rebuttal.
Dec 16, · The moral case for contraception is largely based on the absence - in the eyes of supporters - of any good reason for considering birth control morally wrong. .
Moral Ground: Ethical Action for a Planet in Peril [Kathleen Dean Moore, Michael P. Nelson] on benjaminpohle.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Moral Ground brings together the testimony of over 80 visionaries — theologians and religious leaders.
ethical synonyms, ethical pronunciation, ethical translation, English dictionary definition of ethical. adj.
SCOTUSblog is devoted to covering the U.S. Supreme Court comprehensively, without bias and according to the highest journalistic and legal ethical standards. The blog is provided as a public service. Risky Conditions. Alert, well-meaning, sensitive, mature, and adequately trained therapists functioning within their bounds of competence will encounter ethical dilemmas that can result in vulnerability to charges of misconduct. Note: Next to each question below, you will find a link to the answer(s) we’ve received for that question. We’ve grown tired of refuting answers, so we present the answers from the religious without rebuttal.
1. Of, relating to, or dealing with ethics: an ethical treatise. 2. Being in accordance with the accepted principles of right and wrong that govern the.