The War on Terror is a Fraud "In the mid-'80s, if you remember
See comments below the essay for advice and tips.
Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job. On the other hand, other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It is considered by some that being a university graduate is the key to securing a good job, while there are others who think that it is better to have experience and soft skills. In my opinion, I believe that having university education is essential for academic jobs while soft skills and experience are more useful in business.
On the one hand, many think it is easier for most people to find a good job if they are university graduates with a good degree.
In other words, having tertiary education puts people one step ahead of others who do not and this can be the deciding factor in getting a good job.
On the other hand, having work experience and soft skills, such as leadership skills and other interpersonal skills, can also throw the balance in favour of the applicant, according to some. For many positions there are an overwhelming number of applicants and, therefore, it is often thought that having relevant experience in that line of work or having acquired useful soft skills that can be valuable to a company, can put one ahead of the game when applying for a position.
Finally, in my opinion, whether needing high level education or skills and experience, depends on the position being applied for. Take for example law, medicine or teaching, it is impossible to be considered for a position without the required educational background.
In contrast, in business, it would be more important for a candidate to have soft skills and experience in that line of business so they can step into a position without further training and be of immediate benefit to the company.
In conclusion, getting a good job requires a relevant background either in experience or education depending on the type of work and field.
Introduction. This paper researches the history of the causal problems that led to U.S. government policy resulting in the No Child Left Behind Act. Hello Liz, I am really confused, some web sources tell that in discussion essay, the opinion of the candidate should be given in INTRODUCTION, whereas, others suggest to not include your view in introduction paragraph, just discuss both sides in two body parts and give your opinion ONLY in CONCLUSION. For more than a decade now we have heard that the high-stakes testing obsession in K education that began with the enactment of No Child Left Behind 11 years ago has resulted in high school.
People should make sure they attain the necessary skills or degrees before applying for a job in order to be sure of success.
It has over words but all sentences are relevant, focused and well written. Both sides are clearly discussed and the opinion is also clearly given.
Linking devices are well used.Introduction. This paper researches the history of the causal problems that led to U.S. government policy resulting in the No Child Left Behind Act. Hello Liz, I am really confused, some web sources tell that in discussion essay, the opinion of the candidate should be given in INTRODUCTION, whereas, others suggest to not include your view in introduction paragraph, just discuss both sides in two body parts and give your opinion ONLY in CONCLUSION.
Affordable Papers is an online writing service which has helped students from the UK, US, and Europe for more than 10 years. Our great experience enables us to provide papers of the best quality. The main secrets of our good reputation are trustful relationships with customers and talented academic writers who always create first-chop papers from scratch.
No Child Left Behind Essay. No Child Left Behind; Why we should rethink the current policy. Education was the focus of George W. Bush’s Presidential campaign in Using the improved Texas educational system as an example, President Bush promised to change education in America for the better.
The No. Introduction. This paper researches the history of the causal problems that led to U.S. government policy resulting in the No Child Left Behind Act.
The No Child Left Behind Act Essay - Initiated in , the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of intended to prevent the academic failures of educational institutions and individual students, as well as bridge achievement gaps between students. My first reaction to this post was “Wow, what a bad reason to change your attitudes.” My reaction upon reflection was to notice that I was a leftish neoliberal in my conservative Bible Belt high school, and in my left-wing liberal arts college I became more libertarian, but also more culturally radical so no one could confuse me for one of those Lew Rockwell-type conservative libertarians. Nov 20, · The ESSA is in many ways a U-turn from the current, much-maligned version of the ESEA law, the No Child Left Behind Act.
No Child Left Behind is, “statistically flawed because it makes funding decisions based on raw test scores that compare from year to year, as opposed to changes in scores that could show how much individual students are learning” (Resmovits, Huffington Post, ).