The fact that these studies may not corroborate traditional Reformed interpretations can be used to discount the growing consensus or to reconsider contemporary approaches to soteriology. One of the primary features of the traditional Protestant doctrine of justification is an emphasis on the plight of the individual before God, an individual quest for piety apart from concrete social structures. In line with the personal appeal which has been so central in Protestant faith since Luther, even more since Pietism, and especially since the merging of Protestant existentialism with modern secular personalism — and even more especially since Freud and Jung imposed upon everyone in our culture the vision of man as a self-centered reacting organism — it has seemed quite evident that the primary message of Jesus was a call most properly perceived by an individual, asking the hearer for something that can be done most genuinely by an individual standing alone. It has nothing to do with the structures of society.
Achaia Apollos preaching rather than Paul but included for completeness. The brief descriptions given on other occasions support this assumption. Paul at Antioch in Pisidia The following tables compare the sermon of Paul in Antioch to the previously considered message given by Peter to the household of Cornelius at Caesarea.
I am not he. But behold, there comes one after me, the sandals of whose feet I am not worthy to loose. The introduction has four parts: The order of these elements is not precisely the same in each account, and in two places I have changed the sequence in the Caesarea account in order to better show the correspondence of ideas.
This has been indicated by square brackets. This slight change in order does not significantly diminish the close parallel between the two messages.
The historical preamble is appropriate to the audience, and is very different in content between the two messages.
In the address to Jews, Paul surveys their history from the Exodus, through to the raising up of David. Several phases are described: Strangers in the land of Egypt God exalted them and brought them out Wilderness God put up with their ways God destroyed seven nations and distributed their land Conquest God gave them judges until Samuel Period of the Judges They asked for a king God gave them Saul God removed Saul and raised up David Davidic Kingdom God promised a seed God has raised up Jesus The point of the message is that God has faithfully brought them through to each new phase of their covenant history, in spite of their rebellion.
He will take them into the next phase of their covenant relationship. Both accounts stress that Jesus was sent to Israel. Both of them refer to the baptism of repentance that John preached, and the implication is that the audience knew about him. Paul ends the introduction by repeating that they themselves are the heirs to this long-awaited promise.
Both accounts specify precisely that it was the Jerusalem Jews who committed the crime, and that Jesus was hung on a tree, as one accursed by God.
Peter was a witness to these events, but Paul was not. Instead, Paul substitutes the witness of the Prophets whose words have been fulfilled. It is important for Paul to tie the crucifixion into his historical prologue and show that it was no mistake, but was in fact exactly what the prophets had foretold.
The parallel between the two sermons is very close here. Both state that it was God who raised Jesus up, and that this event was witnessed.
Both make the point that not everyone was a witness of the risen Lord, but only his disciples. They are the ones who were selected to be his witnesses to the people. In both cases there is an announcement at this point that it is this message of the resurrected Christ, that is to be declared.
Both speakers emphasize that it is God who has fulfilled this. There is a slight difference in emphasis—Peter testifies that Jesus is ordained to be judge, whereas Paul declares that the resurrection is the fulfilment of his promise to the fathers.
Both preachers invoke the testimony of the Scriptures at this point, but Paul is much more detailed in his explanation.
Effectively he continues the historical narrative, broken off after v. Just as God had raised up Israel out of Egypt, and raised up David, so he had raised up Christ in exact accordance with the promises in Psalm 2, Isaiah Peter quoted from Psalm 16 in his first sermon and Paul follows exactly the same line of argument—that David lies in the grave, so the promise must refer not to himself but to his seed.
Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts; Let him return to the Lord, and he will have mercy on him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon.
For I work a work in your days, A work which you will by no means believe, Though one were to declare it to you.
The difference is that Paul adds some theological explanation, and ends with a curse.Paul of Tarsus – Essay Paul of Tarsus is one of the most significant persons in early Christian times due to his enormous impact and contribution to the Christian tradition.
He went from being a destroyer of Christians to a committed Christian leader. Paul’s contribution to Christianity mainly comes from his missionary journeys that helped . The HyperTexts English Poetry Timeline and Chronology English Literature Timeline and Chronology World Literature Timeline and Chronology This is a timeline of English poetry and literature, from the earliest Celtic, Gaelic, Druidic, Anglo-Roman, Anglo-Saxon and Anglo-Norman works, to the present day.
Type or paste a DOI name into the text box. Click Go. Your browser will take you to a Web page (URL) associated with that DOI name. Send questions or comments to doi.
Student: Paul of Tarsus and Spp Students Essay example. Bryant Ave S Minneapolis, MN March 8, Dr. Briscoe President Saint Paul Preparatory School Jackson St, Suite St. Paul, MN Dear Dr.
Briscoe, Nowadays, students who want to attend a St. Paul Preparatory School must live with host families. Paul of Tarsus Contribution to the development and expression of Christianity Paul of Tarsus (originally Saul of Tarsus) is widely considered to be central.
Paul of Tarsus was a Jew who had Roman citizenship and tried to stamp out Christianity until he had a vision on the Road to Damascus.